Showing posts with label malicious. Show all posts
Showing posts with label malicious. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Brexit Protection - click here

   Brexit Protection... or should we call it Brexitection? :-)

   How does Brexit affect your finances?  Do you care?  Plenty of people do.

   And that creates an opportunity for scammers.

   Any time there are major news events, particularly disasters or anything economic, people get worried. and the scammers are right there to play on those fears.

   According to the Telegraph, they have seen emails with subjects such as "Brexit causes historic market drop". These emails have links that supposedly connect to pages with information on how to protect your investments.  Of course, they actually download malware to the victims computer.

   This is a common problem... common because it works.

   We've covered this topic before... and the advice remains the same.  In fact, here are my top 10 email scam tips from a 2013 post!  These are just as relevant today as then.  And they will be relevant years from now:

Tuesday, June 28, 2016

We're Going About It All Wrong

   Phishing, scam, spam and malicious emails are an ongoing problem.  A recent study found that rates of these malicious emails are worst in months that have an "a", "u" or "r" in the name, with highest delivery volumes on days ending in a "y".

   Seriously though, while the worldwide spam volume seems to be trending down since a peak over 70% in 2014, rates were trending up in the first quarter of 2016 and the percentage of email that is spam or malicious is well over 50%.

   Email, along with malicious files on websites (whose links are usually delivered through email!), continue to be the top malware vectors.

   In fact, attackers don't even need to use their best, or most complex, attack methods.  It's far more cost-effective to send out random or targeted email, or to place random malicious files on websites and email out the links.  Remember, most cybercrime is economically motivated.  It's a business and the goal is ROI (return on investment).  And business is good.

   It's a big problem because we are fundamentally trusting beings.  I've always believed that people want to do the right thing.  When it comes to people, we should assume positive intent.

   However, email is not a person.

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Ad Where?

   The first website debuted on Dec. 20, 1990 at CERN in Switzerland.  And less than four years later, the first banner ad.  The idea was simple... if people are reading information on a website, why not hit them with an ad?  Media has traditionally been either for-pay or ad-supported and the model for the web included that.  Of course, back then people had no idea the extent to which other screens like laptops, tablets and smartphones, and binge-watching would displace traditional TV watching.

   And shortly after website ads arrived, so did the malware. Ad-ware, also called "malvertising", was born.

   There are a few different ways website ads can cause problems:
  • virus code in the ad itself - so clicking on the ad downloads or executes the malware
  • malicious code that executes based on a mouse action - such as clicking on a flash animation or even just moving your mouse over an ad (called a "drive-by download")
  • a link in the ad brings you to a different page that can have malware, asks for personal information or exploits your browser to grab information from another tab (kind of like phishing)
   You may ask... why would someone allow a virus in an ad on their site?  That's a great question.   The issue is that most sites don't have a direct relationship with the people creating the ads.  The way it typically works is that sites sell space on their pages to ad brokers, who resell that space either to someone wanting to place an ad, or even to other ad brokers.  And often the ads rotate.  It becomes pretty easy for crooks to insert malware into these ad spaces without detection.

   This led to the creation of ad blockers.  These are programs that work in your browser to block content from the 3rd party ad brokers.  There was a big controversy about this in 2015.  On one hand, websites that offer free content need to have a way to monetize.  On the other hand, web and banner ads are annoying, collect our information, and can contain malware.  Some businesses block ads on corporate systems as a way to cut down on malware... and it works.

   To fight back, some sites block people who block ads!

   And that's where things get interesting.

    Let's look at Forbes.com for example.  Many websites simply show their ads along with each page.  If the ads are blocked, then those parts of the pages just don't load, or show a broken image icon.  But when you go to the Forbes website, you first see a welcome page that counts down until you can click to the main page.  While that is happening, the page loads hundreds of those 3rd party ad sites.

   And earlier this year, the Forbes site was serving malware through ads!

   So there's the bind... allow sites to display their ads, including those full sites that only display if ads are allowed; or open the enterprise to malware!

   But shouldn't the responsibility for this malware be with the website that displays the ads?  Shouldn't they test to make sure there isn't executable code in those ads?  I think so.

   I also understand that sites display content that is worth something and they deserve to be compensated.

   There are some compromises.  Some sites ask you to register to see additional content.  You are "paying" by providing information about yourself that they can sell.  Some sites charge nominal subscription fees (some sites charge high subscription fees!).

   There is perhaps some middle ground with Google Contributor.  With this consumer service you pay a nominal monthly fee.  Then google distributes that to sites based upon your usage patterns.

   What are your thoughts?  Is there a middle ground?  Should consumers have to pay for content?  Do we need to be bombarded with ads?  And who should be responsible when sites serve up malware or malicious links?

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

It Wasn't Englebart's Fault! (part 1)

   Douglas Englebart was an engineer, inventor and pioneer of the early internet.  He died in 2013.  He was known for a number of key ideas and inventions.  In 1967, he invented a very useful computer device that is a key component in propagating malware and facilitating phishing attacks... the Mouse!

   Of course, Englebart didn't invent email, email attachments, phishing emails or malicious links.

   The media is always buzzing with information about the latest breach or computer break-in.  We hear about advanced attacks, nation-states and possibility of cyber-war.  Many of these major attacks start with a simple click (or many clicks).

   Two of the main ways that malware is distributed or information is stolen is via:

  • malicious attachments sent in an email, and;
  • phishing emails with malicious links.
   For either of these methods to work, the recipient of the email needs to click... with a mouse! (well, you could also use a track-pad or track-ball).  The attachment needs to be opened.  If it's a zip file, it needs to be unzip'd.  If it's a link, clicking the link might either download malware or lead to a form asking for personal information.  Any of these actions could cause major problems.

   Let's discuss two issues:
  • what do these viruses do?
  • why can't my organization stop these? (or why can't I stop them at home?)
   This is, unfortunately, pretty complex and we'll probably handle these in two separate posts.

Why Viruses?

   As I've discussed in the past, this is really an economics issue.  There's illicit money to be made and there are smart people out there coming up with new ways to attack and take over systems.

   A typical computer virus does 1 of 3 things (I'm using the term virus generically - a virus is actually just one of a number of different types of malware (malicious software)).  It can even do more than one of these:
  1. connect "home" and download more viruses;
        This is an optional step.  The real goals are items #2 and #3.
  2. take over a computer so it can be remotely controlled, or;
        An attacker can take over a bunch of computers and use them to attack other computers or sell that capability to others. The computers taken over are called robots or bots.  They can be used to spread spam and more malware; to send a lot of traffic at target computers so they won't work properly or at all (this is called Denial of Service or DoS), or; might use other attack methods.
  3. steal information (the techy word for this is exfiltration).
        The stolen personal or corporate information can be sold or used to steal money from existing or newly created accounts.
  4. (bonus item) threaten to do the above (blackmail).
        An attacker might threaten to crash computers if not paid.  One kind of malware called "ransomware" encrypts your files so that only the attacker can decrypt them and charges you a fee to get your access back.
What can we do?

   This is a complex issue and we'll talk about protection methods next time.  For now, the best advice is to take measures we've often discussed here:
  • use anti-malware software
  • use care when opening attachments
  • use care when clicking on links
  • know who sent you that email, message, tweet, social network message, etc.
   I discussed these and other steps you can take in a post last year.